Sunday, January 12, 2014

The Grapes of Wrath

As many of you already know, I had the privilege this weekend to travel to Illinois State University for this year's Illinois High School Theatre Festival (yes, the official festival name is spelled "TheatRE"), also called "Theatrefest." This was my fourth and final Theatrefest, and although I'm feeling awfully nostalgic right now, I figured this is as good a time as ever to blog about theatre and performance.

Theatrefest 2014!
This year's All-State Production, wherein high school students from across Illinois audition for a production to be performed at the festival, was "The Grapes of Wrath," and it was certainly intense. Based off the novel by John Steinbeck, "The Grapes of Wrath" follows the story of a family from Oklahoma and their attempt to escape poverty and famine. The family packs up and decides to leave for California, where the work is abundant and the orchards are fertile—according to rumor. When the family finally reaches California (spoiler alert!), they realize how untrue the rumors were: wages are desperately low, work is limited, and the family is split apart. Their dreams of prosperity were both dangerous and ungraspable, and they pay the price in the end.


Steinbeck is well-known for his cynical approach to the American dream. He sees dreams as dangerous, convincing men and women of a future that is impossible to obtain. He blatantly criticizes capitalism for instilling these dreams in the minds of hard-working families, believing that in the end, it's all just a farce.

This blog continues to surprise me by how relevant theatre is to the rest of my life, and "The Grapes of Wrath" is no exception. In English class we too have been discussing the damaging effects of dreams in the context of the memoir "Reading Lolita in Tehran," which explains how an impossible dream led to the oppressive regime that exists today in Iran. The characters in the memoir further relate this reality to "The Great Gatsby," in which Gatsby reaches towards an impossible dream, one that leads to his eventual death.

Performance of "The Great Gatsby" from 2008
Are dreams dangerous? Certainly. Should we avoid them at all costs? While Steinbeck and Fitzgerald might think so, I tend to disagree. In the play I saw over the weekend, dreams of grapes and oranges and prosperity did indeed lead to a broken family; however, dreams of stability and a better life are not always detrimental. Perhaps idealizing a dream is what's truly dangerous. If the family in "The Grapes of Wrath" had realized that no future is ideal, perhaps they would have been more logical in their actions. What's dangerous is when dreams cloud judgement—when they override logic and promote blind faith to an ideal.

In a fit of boredom last week, I decided to watch Conan O'Brien's commencement speech to the Dartmouth Graduating Class of 2011. In it, he states that telling college graduates to follow their dreams is illogical. "Dreams change," he said. I'd like to thank the cast of Theatrefest's "Grapes of Wrath"—or "Grapenation" as they like to call themselves—for showing me that perhaps it's not the dream that's dangerous, but rather the close-mindedness surrounding it.

In conclusion, #GrapeNation #TheatreFest. Time to study for finals!

4 comments:

  1. Hey Alex! I've never read the Grapes of Wrath, or seen it performed but I did have the opportunity to read Steinbeck's 'the Pearl' as part of my English class in 8th grade. It seems to be very similar to the Grapes of Wrath, keeping consistent with Steinbeck's dark and dreamless themes. The family who found the pearl (their 'dream') found out that the pearl was cursed, and kept bringing them bad fortune the longer they kept it for. It had a very sad ending, just like Gatsby and Grapes, but given the time period it made sense. I know the dreams are good, and I do agree that I can change. I know that the dream I have now is way different from my fourth-grade dreams of being an astronaut! But I've changed as a person, and I'll assume that as I continue to grow and change my dreams will too. I hope you had a great time at theatrefest!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi. In your defense, I have also seen Conan O'Brien's commencement speech at Dartmouth, and I found it really interesting, and somewhat sincerer than many commencement speeches I've seen. If you are in a political mood, watch his speech at the White House Correspondent's dinner. But this is all of little consequence... Your post reminded me of some of Nafisi's thoughts near the end of Reading Lolita in Tehran. I agree that what you characterize as idealizing a dream is bad, but I wonder if sometimes, dreaming is an escape. For the family in Steinbeck's novel, dreaming is a motivational tool. Yet unlike Nafisi, the family has a chance to escape and realize their dream. For Nafisi, fiction, dreaming, and fantasies allow for her and others to mentally supplant themselves, and temporarily visit a different place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand that dreams can be dangerous, but in incredibly desperate situations, I think a dream is necessary. It seems to me that even if, in the end, dreams are a let-down, and even if they are a sort of Band-Aid solution to cope with the situation, it is better to have a dangerous, "idealized" dream than no dream at all.

      Delete
  3. Jacob, I agree, and I think dreaming is an effective and logical coping mechanism in many situations. The danger, however, exists when this dream begins to invade into reality. People become attached to an ideal, and "escaping" becomes "running away." I think Nafisi would agree! :)

    ReplyDelete